← Back
Meteor radio technology

Author(s): Svitlana Kolomiyets

Affiliations:Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Contact:svitlana.kolomiyets@nure.ua

Abstract: It is known that the enchanting phenomenon of shooting stars in the dark sky is associated with the formation of ionized trails that appears after the invading from space meteoroids. In the visible range, we fix the light with the eye (or an optical device) and astronomers need a dark sky to study the meteor phenomenon in the visible range. Radio technologies make it possible to study meteors day and night, even when the sky is covered with clouds or when the meteors are very weak (or artificial illumination of the sky is significant). In this case, as a rule, not the radio emission of the meteor itself is recorded (the meteor's own radio emission is very weak), but the reflected radiation of an external source from the trail. Meteor radio technologies include semi-active and active radiolocation. The report will pay attention to the problem of meteor radiolocation from the point of view of pollution of certain wave ranges. At the same time, meteor radiolocation is an important modern toolkit. The existing contradiction will be discussed

References:

  • Brown P. et.al. (2005) The velocity distribution of meteoroids at the Earth as measured by the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR). Earth, Moon, and Planets
  • Ellyett C.D., Davies J.G. (1948)Velocity of meteors measured by diffraction of radio waves from trails during formation. Nature, 161, 596-7
  • Hocking W.K. , Kolomiyets S.V. (2020) Radio meteor physics – a comparison between techniques from 1945 to the mid-1970's. Radiotekhnika, 2(201), 78–90.
  • Janches D. et al. (2020) Characteristics of very faint (+16) meteors detected with the Middle Atmosphere ALOMAR Radar System (MAARSY). Icarus, 340, p. 113444. Elsevier
  • Janches D. et al. (2013) Interferometric Meteor Head Echo Observations using the Southern Argentina Agile Meteor Radar (SAAMER). NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
  • Jones, J., Webster, A. R., Hocking W. K. (1998) An improved interferometer design for use with meteor radars. Radio Science, Vol. 33, 1, 55-65.
  • Kahscheyev B.L. et al.(1996) Meteors today.-K.:Technika,195. In Russian 8. Kashcheyev B.L (1960) Radar observations of meteors according to the program of the International Geophysical Year . Research of the ionosphere and meteors. Digest of articles. Section V of the IGY program (Ionosphere and Meteors) Moscow: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 2, 40–53.
  • 9 Kero J., Szasz C., and Nakamura T (2013) MU head echo observations of the 2010 Geminids: radiant, orbit, and meteor flux observing Ann. Geophys., 31, 439–449.
  • Kolomiyets S.V. (2012) Kharkiv automated meteor radio system “MARS”: Its historical significance in radio astronomy. 22nd International Crimean Conference "Microwave & Telecommunication Technology“ , 46-47.
  • Kolomiyets S.V. (2018) Meteor sky in Time-Domain Astronomy, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 14 (S339), 318-321
  • Lovell B. (1954) Meteor astronomy, Oxford At Claredon press, 48
  • McKay-Bukowski D. et. al. (2015) KAIRA: The Kilpisjärvi AtmosphericImaging Receiver Array— SystemOverview and First Results. IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 53, 3, March 2015
  • Villard O.G., Peterson A.M. (1953) Meteor Scatter. A Newly-Discovered Means for Extended-Range Communication in the 15- and 20-Meter Bands. April 1953 QST 11-15,124,126
  • Webster A.R. et al.( 2004) The Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR), Atmos. Chem. Phys. Disc 4, 1181- 1201.
  • View Poster